On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 01:33:26 -0400, Miro Jurisic <macdev@meeroh.org> wrote:
In article <ciieha$70o$1@sea.gmane.org>, "David B. Held" <dheld@codelogicconsulting.com> wrote:
Also, types ending in _t tend to be reserved for typedefs of fundamental types
All identifiers ending with _t are reserved by POSIX. Unless you are a part of a language or library standard that is part of POSIX (which boost isn't), you should stay away from all such identifiers.
</lurk> (?) I thought that's what namespaces were for. Is the _t reservation a C equivalent of a reserved namespace? If POSIX defines _t macros I guess namespaces won't help, but if not why do we need to reserve _t names for POSIX use? <lurk> Max Wilson -- Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant. They make a desert and call it peace. -Tacitus