Re: [boost] Boost Test Policy

On 25/08/10 06:29, Dave Abrahams wrote:

It always has been. While Boost.Test has some cool features, they don't seem to markedly improve the quality of testing in a library that uses Boost.Test, which mostly depends on the skill of the test designer. Also, if you use lightweight_test.hpp you are liable to continue to get useful test results even if Boost.Test should be broken ;-)

Note that lightweight_test is also useful to run Boost liek UT on embedded platform where Boost.Test may not be abel to be compiled.