Re: [boost] [bimap][multi_index][range] sub_range vs std::pair<iter, iter>

Matias Capeletto skrev:

On 5/24/07, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> wrote:

If bm is const I think we have to write:

boost::sub_range< const bm_type::map_by<name> > r = bm.by<name>().range(...,...);

right.

that it is not bad anyway. But I really like the look of the following code:

bm_type::map_by<name>::const_iterator_range r = bm.equal_range(...);

bm_type::map_by<name>::iterator_range r = bm.range(...,...);

Are you against provide these typedefs?

not at all.

(maybe with another name: sub_range, range, range_type)

simply "range" and "cont_range" is more concise IMO. The relation to iterators is immplied. -Thorsten