Re: [boost] [variant] match()

...

I use syntax like this:

case_<void>(v)( [](A & a){ cout << "it's a A!"; } [](B & b){ cout << "oh, a B!"; } [](C & c){ cout << "ah yes, a C!"; } [](auto & d){ cout << "a default!"; } );

Shouldn't it be switch_ instead of case_?

I used `case_` because I was wanting to mimic OCaml syntax, but `switch_` might make more sense for C++. Paul -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/variant-match-tp4670714p4670761.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.