David Abrahams wrote:
Because we read english text from left to right?
Or why is Boostd:: (given the colorized logo) better than std::Boost (logo or text)?
#1, ditto. #2, it's shorter.
If only I had a decent tool I'd do something better than ASCII art, anyway, I thought that in my original, the small apostrophy allowed one to think "I've Boost'd my code" you could even have an icon for inclusion on web pages/in software indicating some kind of support for the technology. Through careful font construction you could probably swicth the apostrophy into a '+' and drop the false cross bar on the d and still keep the C++ (the new + being the second, the former still being part of the t). Perhaps the C++ could be a different colour drop shadow like the std:: Keepin the Boost part in the forground. Kevin -- | Kevin Wheatley, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd | Nobody thinks this | | Senior Technology | My employer for certain | | And Network Systems Architect | Not even myself |