3 Dec
2008
3 Dec
'08
8:53 p.m.
"David Abrahams" <dave@boostpro.com> wrote in message news:87hc5lfak7.fsf@mcbain.luannocracy.com...
This relates to another thread. Should libraries be marked as stable/experimental?
I like it, but I would prefer stable/new. Libraries that aren't new shouldn't be unstable, and rewrites would make the library "new" again.
Agreed completely. This would be very useful to have.