
1 Nov
2010
1 Nov
'10
2:54 p.m.
At Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:43:42 +0000, Neil Groves wrote:
// After my proposed modification, the return type becomes a // pair of the index and the original reference type of the // underlying iterator/range.
Copying those elements into the pair could get expensive. Maybe you want to wrap a counting_iterator around that iterator; just a thought. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com