Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.-2 wrote
On this basis I think I will make a report and see
what they say.
Can't argue with that.
I'm now convinced it is a bug, because mpl::transform uses mpl::is_lambda_expression for the exact same purpose as my application, and it clearly assumes that is_lambda_expression behaves according to its name. I will make an example to submit with the report.
Well, one solution is to assume T1 is a lambda expression if it's not a sequence. ...
This is currently how e.g. mpl::transform behaves, but it's incorrect because a class can be both a sequence and a lambda expression in which case it is supposed to be treated as an operator. -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/mpl-is-lambda-expression-bug-tp4642509p46... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.