"Rozental, Gennadiy" <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com> writes:
- test: ifstream_line_iterator_test
Commented out by the author -- http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/libs/test/te st/Jamfile?r1=1.23&r2=1.24
I'm not sure whether this is a good practice. I'd say that if the test failure indicates a real issue with the library on a particular set of compilers -- even if that set includes most of them -- then marking it up as an "expected failure" with a corresponding note would be more fair.
Michael? Gennadiy?
Above test actually should pass on almost all compilers (as it does locally). For some reason it fails during regression test. Something about couldn't find pattern file. So, because
1. I do not know how to fix that. 2. Nobody responded on my request 3. This test is not critical for this release 4. We have enough on our plates already
I decided to comment it out for now. I plan to reinclude it after release.
The way libs/test/test/Jamfile refers to input files is broken. there should be no use of $(test-dir). tests are always run from the directory of the Jamfile. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com