11 Nov
2010
11 Nov
'10
7:14 p.m.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Kazutoshi Satoda <k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp> wrote:
Domagoj Saric wrote:
this 'overhead' of a few static pointers is completely insignificant compared to various related code bloat issues...
That should be true. But unfortunately, the overhead of static pointers are actually significant while they are not const, at least for me.
Thanks for following up on this. I looked into it and this seems like a good idea to me. I attached a patch to your ticket. Daniel Walker