4 Oct
2008
4 Oct
'08
11:36 p.m.
Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
Joel de Guzman wrote:
lambda(_x, _y)[ let. _z = _x + _y, _z * _z ]
I think that the implicit let will be much less of an issue in a lambda context than it is in Python (or Javascript), though.
Doesn't that imply that _a, _b, ... have to be enumerated in the definition of let?
Not sure I understand.
let. _z ^
let must be an object that has a member called _z.
Right. Now I understand. Now I also understand why you want to be able to name the locals. Pardon me for being slow. It's been an overwhelming review. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net