Hi everyone, boost::container::container_detail::pair's piecewise constructor is missing, as acknowledged in a comment. This makes container::flat_map::emplace less useful (perhaps useless) as the following will not work: boost::container::flat_multimap<TestKey, TestValue> testMap; testMap.emplace(boost::container::container_detail::piecewise_construct, boost::make_tuple(30), boost::make_tuple(50)); where both TestKey and TestValue are non-copyable, moveable classes with a constructor taking an int. The compilation error message will correctly say that boost::container::container_detail::pair does not have a constructor with three arguments. I tried to implement the missing piecewise constructor based on std::pair's in the g++ standard libraries. I failed at it, so I would like to request some assistance and education. This is where I got: // from the standard lib template<std::size_t _Num> struct _Build_index_tuple { typedef typename _Build_index_tuple<_Num-1>::__type::__next __type; }; // from the standard lib template<> struct _Build_index_tuple<0> { typedef _Index_tuple<> __type; }; template <class... Args1, class... Args2> pair(piecewise_construct_t, ::boost::tuple<Args1...> first_args, ::boost::tuple<Args2...> second_args) : pair(::boost::move(first_args), ::boost::move(second_args), typename _Build_index_tuple<sizeof...(Args1)>::__type(), typename _Build_index_tuple<sizeof...(Args2)>::__type()) {} template<typename... Args1, std::size_t... Indices1, typename... Args2, std::size_t... Indices2> explicit pair(tuple<Args1...> tuple1, tuple<Args2...> tuple2, _Index_tuple<Indices1...>, _Index_tuple<Indices2...>) : first(::boost::forward<Args1>(std::get<Indices1>(tuple1))...), second(::boost::forward<Args2>(std::get<Indices2>(tuple2))...) { } This gets me a recursive error message far too long to quote, starting with: error C2664: 'boost::container::container_detail::pair<Key,T>::pair(std::pair<Key,T> &&)' : cannot convert parameter 3 from 'boost::tuples::tuple<int,boost::tuples::null_type // lot of null_types omitted to 'boost::tuples::tuple<boost::tuples::null_type, // lot of null_types omitted I used the VS2012 Nov CTP compiler. I understand that variadic templates have not been very portable and boost::unordered, which has a piecewise constructor implementation, does it completely differently and much more painfully. But is there a reason for the approach I tried not to work with boost at all? Could you please help me fix this code? Thank you very much, Laszlo Szecsi