
26 Jul
2006
26 Jul
'06
12:47 a.m.
John Maddock wrote:
Johan RĂ¥de wrote:
So it would make sense to have the functions
is_finite() is_normal() is_subnormal()
is_infinity() is_plus_infinity() is_minus_infinity()
is_nan()
Do we really want to use gratuitously different names from those in C99:
isfinite isnorm isinf isnan
Yes ! Once again there is no reason to let the "C" language determine how things are done in "C++". The names suggested by Johan Rade are much more easily rememberable than the "C" names above.