Rene Rivera wrote: [...]
Which when applied to the other functions, compiles without warnings. And since all the tests pass, I checked in the changes to CVS.
Also, I forgot to ask about something I noticed.. In sp_counted_base.hpp there is this sequence: #elif defined( __GNUC__ ) && ( defined( __i386__ ) || defined( __x86_64__ ) ) # include <boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp> ...and further along... #elif defined( WIN32 ) || defined( _WIN32 ) || defined( __WIN32__ ) # include <boost/detail/sp_counted_base_w32.hpp> Question is.. Shouldn't we be using the Win32 implementation in the case of GCC on Windows, i.e. under MinGW? -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org