29 Nov
2004
29 Nov
'04
11:05 p.m.
Daniel Frey wrote:
Oh, I misunderstood that. But why doesn't std::Boost imply that Boost libraries (at least some) aim to become part of the standard (that is namespace std::)?
Because we read english text from left to right?
Or why is Boostd:: (given the colorized logo) better than std::Boost (logo or text)?
#1, ditto. #2, it's shorter. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com