"David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message news:u4qqiep5w.fsf@boost-consulting.com...
Just to clarify, we're talking about mpl::lambda here.
Right.
"David B. Held" <dheld@codelogicconsulting.com> writes:
[...]
Now, my understanding is that we can use Lambda so that we can invoke Foo this way:
Foo<P> f;
for some definition of "invoke" ;-)
I like to think of "operator<>" as the "metafunction call operator". ;> It helps me to think of it in a more MPL-like way.
[...] In the upcoming version of MPL (very soon now) mpl::apply -- which you'll want to use even to invoke metafunction classes portably (no, using P::template apply<whatever>::type doesn't work everywhere) --
Really? Where does that not work?
will invoke mpl::lambda internally, so the upshot is that passing either lambda expressions or metafunction classes will work.
Cool. Is "Real Soon Now(TM)" within the next month? Dave --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.683 / Virus Database: 445 - Release Date: 5/12/2004