Re: [boost] Interest in super string class?

Jeff Garland wrote:

Now lets examine the hastily created *pre-alpha* super_string docs:

template<class char_type> void basic_super_string< char_type >::replace_all_regex( const base_string_type & match_regex, const base_string_type & replace_format)

OK, now I 'get it'. Until this example I simply saw functions moving from one interface into another - now I see that the interface itself becomes cleaner. Move me from 'skeptic' to 'believer', although I still can't help feeling dirty for endorsing this! Some dogma just runs too deep to easily walk away from I guess. -- AlisdairM