AMDG On 03/19/2011 03:16 AM, pavel wrote:
Steven wrote on Saturday, March 19, 2011 at 1:31:51:
"...In the first alternative (delete object), the value of the operand of delete may be a null pointer value, a pointer to a non-array object created by a previous new-expression, or a pointer to a subobject (1.8) representing a base class of such an object (Clause 10). If not, the behavior is undefined." it looks like you are citing the old std (or i have a corrupted copy)
Actually, I got it from n3242 which is a recent C++0x draft.
here is the full citation of 5.3.5.2 of ISO/IEC 14882:2003(E) which, i guess, you are referring to:
"<snip>"
feel free to prove me wrong
Okay. Let's do this a different way (a little later in the section): "In the first alternative (delete object), if the static type of the operand is different from its dynamic type, the static type shall be a base class of the operand’s dynamic type and the static type shall have a virtual destructor or the behavior is undefined." In Christ, Steven Watanabe