29 May
2007
29 May
'07
5:34 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
on Mon May 28 2007, Michael Stevens <list-boost-AT-michael-stevens.de> wrote:
Personally, I don't think it makes sense. It looks like in the very near future this library will be the one and only piece of Boost that is not under BSL. I think having one single special case hurts Boost way more than it helps.
Agreed. Thomas -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org