25 Jul
2011
25 Jul
'11
7:40 p.m.
on Sun Jul 24 2011, "Phil Endecott" <spam_from_boost_dev-AT-chezphil.org> wrote:
If Tim did that then we would need to review it now, right?
Only its implementation, not its interface or documentation.
(For correctness, anyway. Not necessarily for its interface. But that doesn't make much difference in practice, since the interface is supposed to be the std:: one.)
yes. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com