25 May
2010
25 May
'10
11:45 a.m.
On 25/05/2010 13:27, Terry Golubiewski wrote:
In my post, I had suggested alternate implementation of forward() and I thought I needed another version of move(). Also, should boost have versions of add_rv_reference<> and such? What do you think?
forward is a version that is thought to be a correct implementation for implementation #5 from N2951 (code was provided by a LWG member). I'll need to check what move does in C++0x with const references. Regarding add_rv_reference<>, I don't know if that's useful for Boost.Move, it should be in TypeTraits, no doubt, but I don't know if use-cases for add_rv_reference will allow using emulation mode. We'll see this when boosters start pushing move semantics to the limit. Best, Ion