On 14/10/2021 11:59, Vinnie Falco wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 3:52 PM Gavin Lambert wrote:
Bear in mind that most of those are Reported and not Verified, so they should be treated as non-authoritative comments.
Never a dull moment!!
For example, the suggested amendment for parsing too many .. path components seems incorrect and the original is more correct. (Unmatched .. components should not be left in a canonical URL.)
I'm still working on that part. But I think that the reg-name change is legit?
The addition of path-abempty doesn't actually change anything it seems, but I have updated the documentation.
I have no particular opinion on path-abempty; that one might be ok. But the suggested change to .. parsing is actively harmful and you should not do it -- a canonical path should never contain .. components, especially not leading ones.