Pavol Droba <droba@topmail.sk> writes:
For me, this seems rather fine. I have tried to sumarize something similar in <http://tinyurl.com/3wgvu>.
The "defintion" of the strong guarantee here is just wrong: Some functions can provide the strong exception-safety guarantee. That means that following statements are true: If an exception is thrown, there are no effects other than those of the function ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I don't mean to pick on you, Pavol, but I don't understand why this keeps happening: people seem unsatisfied with my original wording and make changes that alter the meaning. In fact, the statement that a function has "no effects other than those of the function" is a meaningless tautology. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com