"vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> writes:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Williams" <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:43 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Futures Review - wait_for_any Concept parameters
Vicente Botet Escriba <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> writes:
Please, could you give us which is the Concept for the wait_for_any parameter template function? It is not clear from the documentation which are the functions must be provided by the Models.
With the library as it stands, wait_for_any works with any specializations of unique_future or shared_future, but only those --- it is inherently tied to their implementation.
Oh, I see. I've missed that on the documentation which is clearly stated on the preconditions.
If this function works only for unique/shared future, its name is too generic to be placed at the boost namespace. Do you plan to include it in a specific futures namespace?
It could be moved inside a namespace. I'm not really bothered. Alternatively, if it could be extended for other types then that would work too. Anthony -- Anthony Williams | Just Software Solutions Ltd Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL