22 Mar
2005
22 Mar
'05
9:19 p.m.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:14:59 -0500, Gennadiy Rozental <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com> wrote:
Fair enough. If only we could figure out why Boost.Test was failing (it looked like a legitimate compiler error), we could probably get the failure rate down quite a bit.
One of the recent versions of Boost.Test should've compile with Sunpro 5.3.
I will make sure release version pass this compiler either. Where could I see an errors?
OK, the SunPRO results are back now. Boost.Test isn't faring so well: http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/cvs-head/developer/tes... and more specifically: http://tinyurl.com/5qr49 -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com