There have been many suggestions in the past of singleton implementations to this list, all flawed in subtle and not so subtle ways. I strongly recommend finding those and the feedback on them and understand them.
I found these suggestions. As often happens, write again - it is easier than learning the old suggestions. I glanced at the debate [http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/01/index.php]. And I decided to use self singleton implementation because of: 1) it has already written and usual for me (despite the fact that it is rigid and does not have any policies); 2) at the moment I do not have sufficient time for feedback and understanding the [http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/01/index.php] debate (but this is certainly an interesting practice).
Again, I recommend researching why the previous ambitious attempts have not been universally accepted.
So, I am to reject my ambitious boost::Singleton request. It remains for my personal use only. P.S.: could anybody tell your experience of Loki::Singleton? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Boost.utility--tp27309940p27321121.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.