20 Apr
2010
20 Apr
'10
6:21 p.m.
On 20 April 2010 19:06, Stephan T. Lavavej <stl@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
We picked up an <initializer_list> header from Dinkumware, but I forgot to remove it when I purged the code conditionally compiled under _HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS from our sources. Oops. (This header doesn't actually do anything because the Core Language support is nonexistent.)
I think we define BOOST_NO_INITIALIZER_LISTS since there isn't initialiser list support, but don't define BOOST_NO_0X_HDR_INITIALIZER_LIST since there is a header. This is technically correct, but a bit confusing. Daniel