From: "Paul A Bristow" <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com>
| -----Original Message----- | From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org | [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Marcin Kaliciñski | Sent: 15 April 2005 23:59 | To: boost@lists.boost.org | Subject: [boost] Re: [website] Oh the fun.. | | > | > http://redshift-software.com/~grafik/boost/index.htm | > http://redshift-software.com/~grafik/boost/more/version_history.html | | Great. I only don't like these underlined links,
I DO like the underlining, but perhaps the font for links is not bold/big enough? It looks a bit too similar to the text font?
The underlines as of now appear very much like the navbar grouping lines. That is, they appear to be sectioning the text rather than marking what may be links. What about using a faint highlighting (background color) in the main text at least? With most any distinct marking, once you recognize that something is a link, you can find the rest. The problem is finding something that looks enough like a link to attract the pointer. Can you allow the browser's normal link underlining be the style used when the pointer hovers over a link? That is, instead of creating your own link look when hovering, let the links look "normal" when hovering. -- Rob Stewart stewart@sig.com Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;