23 Aug
2007
23 Aug
'07
4:37 p.m.
I agree with Steven, This syntax looks same as the new Boost.Parameter syntax, and this is good for the Boost as a whole. Thanks, Maxim 23.08.07, 20:03, Steven Watanabe:
I prefer BOOST_SCOPE_EXIT((cref c)(ref r)(val v)) for two reasons. 1) It makes it clear that they are /not/ function calls 2) It's slightly easier to implement because you can use BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH. In Christ, Steven Watanabe