Vicente Botet wrote
Daryle Walker wrote
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:55:33 +0000 From: dnljms@
On 12 December 2011 12:46, Daryle Walker <darylew@> wrote:
Should we add preprocessor stuff to conditionally use the C++11 "enum
class" construct?
We have something like that already:
Reading it, it doesn't have any base type and/or forward-declaration facilities.
How do you want to be able to use forward declaration in a portable way?
There are also scoped enums with underlying type that are no enum class. These could be added as well.
How do you think we can use scoped enum with underlying types in a portable way? I guess the use that states that an enum is a char expect the sizeof this enum to be the same as the sizeof char, isn't it? I have been working a little bit on a enums library that provides such a feature (see https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/enums/libs/enums/doc/html/index.html). Let me know if you are interested. Vicente Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Add-macros-for-the-enum-class-concept-tp4... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.