On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Norbert Wenzel <norbert.wenzel.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
But any new library that requires C++14 is of no use to our company
What about C++11? The difference between C++14 and C++11 is not that large. As a sole programmer maintaining a library offering, it wasn't too much trouble for me to restrict myself to C++11. Simply rewriting lambdas taking auto parameters into hand rolled classes, and not using library conveniences like std::enable_if_t was sufficient. But supporting anything before C++11 would require a rather large increase in the amount of change and maintenance, and more resources than I have available to devote to the project. On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Thijs (M.A.) van den Berg <thijs@sitmo.com> wrote:
If the devices are network attached then this sounds like a great usecase for testing the beast http boost library?
Note that Beast requires C++11 (see http://vinniefalco.github.io/beast/beast/intro/requirements.html)