JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
----- Mensaje original ----- De: David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com>
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin@tid.es> writes: [...]
is in boost::detail::allocator), I don't have any problem with renaming to allocator_helper (it's a better name, actually.) If no one else objects (which I doubt) I'll apply the name change tomorrow.
I think allocator_rebind would be a much better name than allocator_helper.
Ummm, the problem with allocator_rebind is that the header contains some other stuff not strictly related to rebinding:
* partial_std_allocator_wrapper * construct (allocator-independent construction function) * destroy (allocator-independent destruction function)
Those latter two aren't really allocator helpers, are they? ;-) I don't know what the first one is, but maybe this should be 3 separate headers. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com