Eric Niebler wrote:
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
"Eric Niebler" <eric@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message news:47150CB0.8060302@boost-consulting.com...
Beman Dawes wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
We seem to be having a lot of problems with Boost.Test lately. This is really bad. Should we revert Boost.Test to something that works? Yes. This is a disaster.
Can you do the revert? I'm tied up. It looks like a series of changes where make on revisions 40065-40078, and then 40090. I've reverted all the Boost.Test changes since r40064. You reverted to wrong version. 40064 includes the issue with infinite recursion.
OK, but you didn't say which revision I should revert to, so I just reverted all the way back to r40013, which is just before a huge number of Boost.Test changes.
Beman, others, please give this a shot.
The Windows and Linux smoke tests are looking for updates every 15 minutes, and then running tests if anything has changed. The tests take about 5 minutes if changes had little impact. Boost.Test changes force recompiles of a lot of other libraries, so they take up to an hour. See http://beta.boost.org/development/testing.html#SmokeTesting for links to the test results. --Beman