19 Apr
2011
19 Apr
'11
7:24 p.m.
On 19/04/2011 17:27, Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
On 04/19/2011 08:13 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
On 18/04/2011 14:24, Artyom wrote:
some compile-time values tested at runtime, some things that could have reused existing utilities from Boost,
More specific points?
I saw stuff like
if(is_linear_iterator<SomeType>::is_linear) ....
And what exactly is wrong with this? Most compilers are perfectly capable of optimizing away the branch, and it makes the code more straightforward than any compile time selection mechanism.
True, it's a style thing, but the fact that there were several issues with this single line caught my eye.