Hi, as probably everyone in here, I have written many factory implementations and plugin managers in various projects, and decided to throw them all together into a set of template classes. My current approach looks like this: - class registrable base class for objects that can be registered somewhere - class registry : public registrable base class for objects that need to register some other objects. inherits from registrable, so there can be a registry of all registries (I think that can be made optional, but haven't found a compelling reason to do so). defines a set of abstract functions that registries need to implement (register/unregister of const/non-const objects), and static functions to register/unregister objects (by going through the list of registries and passing the object to each). - template<typename obj> class creator : public registrable base class for objects responsible for instantiating a concrete class and providing an object to match the factory argument against. - template<typename obj> class factory : public registry<creator<object_type>> factory. registers creators and can be asked to instantiate objects. - template<typename obj, typename stream> class parser base class for parsers. holds a stream reference and an object of "obj" type, defines some abstract functions and knows how to create proxy objects for the postincrement operator. - template<typename obj, typename stream> class parseiterator holds and owns a pointer to a parser<obj, stream> object, behaves like an iterator. can be instantiated on the stack, uses parameters to instantiate parser by using factory<parser<obj, stream>>. I believe these things are fairly generic and was surprised that they weren't already there. Would it make sense to add these to boost (after properly specifying and documenting them, of course)? Simon