Joel de Guzman wrote:
No. By the standard, `result<F(int)>` means that rvalue is passed, and `result<F(T&)>` means that lvalue is passed.
Exactly! And, again, `deref` uses `result<F(T&)>` --as expected.
I should say Yes! :-) BTW, result<F(int)> may be called from deref in case of sequence of rvalues.
But, as_vector applied to transform_view uses `result_of` in a strange manner through value_of.
A FunctionObject for transform_view requires two result_of implementations; It seems impossible. I provided an example, didn't I? That doesn't work with rvalues.
Of course it does :-) Did you try it? The example I attached (in the trac ticket) can even work with mpl::vector.
Ah, yes. I said about `f` in this thread.
Again, see fusion zip.
My range zipper is used like this: `my_zip(fusion::make_list(std::string("abc"),std::string("123"))`. Again, I place this simple question: When at_c return type Sequence of input is: int&, char, double const&, ... , how can I create fusion::vector<result_of<F(int&)>::type, result_of<F(char)>::type, result_of<F(double const&)>::type, ...> ? Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame