Jarrad Waterloo <jwaterloo <at> dynamicquest.com> writes:
// No separator
template<class Type> Type get(const tr1_or_boost::array<key_type,T>& path, const Type &default_value, const std::locale &loc = std::locale()) const;
template<class CharType> std::basic_string<CharType> get(const tr1_or_boost::array<key_type,T>& path, const CharType *default_value, const std::locale &loc = std::locale()) const;
Why not template <class IteratorT> string_type get(IteratorT beg, IteratorT end); template <class IteratorT> string_type get(IteratorT beg, IteratorT end, const string_type::value_type* default_value); I don't really se the need for the converting get functions. Why is pt.get<double>(path) better than lexical_cast<double>(pt.get(path)). (or string_to or atof)
// No separator
template<class Type> basic_ptree &put(const tr1_or_boost::array<key_type,T>& path, const Type &value, bool do_not_replace = false, const std::locale &loc = std::locale());
Same here: why not pt.put(path.begin(), path.end(), lexical_cast<string>(val))