
1 Mar
2005
1 Mar
'05
6:31 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
Okay, we have to fix that. This is just confusing.
I really thought we had already decided that there was no reason to post two different result formats. Is there any reason to keep the non-metacomm format up there?
Right now it's the only way for me to get current Linux results, since the meta-comm linux results for iostreams are a month old. I've posted a number of messages to the testing list, starting at least three weeks ago, but the problem has not been fixed and I haven't even discovered if the problem is on Martin's end, meta-comm's end, or both. Jonathan