There are a couple of useful reports on svn.boost.org:
Active Showstoppers: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/report/43 Active Regressions: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/report/30
To shortcut part of the discussion, here are some definitions (taken from https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/TicketWorkflow):
• Showstopper - this problem is so bad, that we should hold up a release if it's not fixed. Note that the release managers and/or
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:00:21 -0800, Marshall Clow wrote: the
library maintainers may have different opinions.
• Regression - something used to work (in a previous release), but no longer does.
IMHO, these bugs should be at least looked at before each release.
Hello, concerning regressions in Boost.Test, ticket #6331 "g++ compilation error due to ambiguity between template<class Cond, class T> struct boost::enable_if and class boost::unit_test::decorator::enable_if as well as the disable_if counterparts introduced after Boost 1.48.0 (up to at least svn rev. 76217)" <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6331> is quite annoying, as it makes Boost.Test unusable with all libraries, which make use of boost::enable_if<Cond, T> and don't fully qualify the namespace boost::. This affects also several Boost libraries, e.g., Boost.Spirit. This breaking change was introduced after the Boost 1.48 release. Best regards, Torsten Maehne
-- Marshall
Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:mclow.lists@gmail.com>
A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait). -- Yu Suzuki
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost