20 Oct
2004
20 Oct
'04
4:27 p.m.
In article <00da01c4b6a3$114a1a10$0600a8c0@pdimov>, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> wrote:
Miro Jurisic wrote:
I completely agree with Erik on this. For anything except for US english, the interface of basic_string grafted on top of a sequence of UTF code points produces wrong results for most people most of the time.
How did basic_string even enter the discussion?
You said string::operator== which I interpreted to mean basic_string::operator== rather than fictitious_unicode_string::operator==. meeroh