3 Nov
2010
3 Nov
'10
6:01 p.m.
Long story short of this post: Are there any plans (left) to add additional name mangling to the boost libs on Windows to address the problem of mismatched _SECURE_SCL setting?
Long story short: I'm happy to add this to the auto-linking header if we all agree on a mangling scheme - how about "idl#" where # is the IDL level? However, there really isn't much point in this unless we also add this to Boost.Build: since it seems that now that this has been rationalized in VC10 I guess "idl=0/1/2" would work well? Unless it's possible to have HID=1 SCL=0 as an option in any VC versions? John.