Jeremy Maitin-Shepard-2 wrote:
On 03/26/2011 03:19 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote: > Hello all, > > I am updating Boost.Local docs and I could use a some help in getting > the Alternatives section right > http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/local/libs/local/doc/html/boost_local...
You might include compile time and run time benchmarks, information about error message quality, and polymorphic capabilities. Additionally, you might note that with C++0x local classes can be used with templates.
Good suggestions. I will include all of those. How would the polymorphic (type) row read? (I don't fully understand this...) For example: Type Polymorphism ------------------ Boost.Local: Yes but only of type of bound parameters (not for normal function parameters). Local Classes: No. C++0X Lambdas: Yes but only of type of bound parameters (not for normal function parameters). Boost.Lambda: No?? Boost.Phoenix: No?? Is this correct? Thank you very much. --Lorenzo -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/local-Help-for-the-Alternatives-section-t... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.