On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:32:44 +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote
Jeff Garland wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:00:12 +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 13:04, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Hi, the date_time, specifically the libs/date_time/xmldoc directory, includes the catalog.xml file:
This is an internally used file, so it shouldn't cause errors - but perhaps an error has crept in? Are you seeing a problem when you try and generate the overall boost results?
No, I see a problem when trying to build date_time docs.
Maybe you can be more explicit about what you are doing and the errors you are seeing. BTW, we haven't been able to build docs for quite awhile now and our requests for help have gone unanswered on the boost-doc list. We weren't sure what magic was applied to do the 1.32 release.
I noted before that for the 1.32 pdf date-time was excluded and no one explained why/how that happened since the html was clearly generated :-(
I recall it was some kind of fop -> pdf convert bug, but I'm not sure.
Ok.
And date_time_autodoc.boostbook/ and other *.boostbook files should not be in CVS, too.
Yes, well, since we haven't been sucessful in getting all of the doxygen to boost-book bridge to work well for date-time we have to slightly modify the generated files for our purpose. So that's why those are there.
You mean that each time after modifying headers, you have to manually tweak the generated files?
That's correct -- although I think we actually use a script to do it. Sorry to say I've been hands-off of this for awhile so I don't know the details. Hopefully Bart will post later and describe the details. Jeff