Peter Dimov wrote:
Or perhaps just switching to:
template<class T> size_t hash_value( T * const & p );
?
How embarrassing....I hadn't thought of that. I was trying every way I could think of to declare the array function. I might not be able to get it to work for older compilers though. But that's not such a big deal. I'll see how it goes. I still think it may be a good idea to change hash_combine's specification (but not necessarily it's implementation) to be in terms of boost::hash (or std::hash). But that's up to you. Thorsten wrote:
Does
template< class T > void hash( size_t&, const T* );
template< class T, unsigned N > void hash( size_t&, const T (&array)[N] );
not work?
It depends on which compiler you ask, intel linux (EDG based) says no. (Sorry, for not replying to your mail directly, but I seem to have lost it, which is a bit odd since I'm using gmane). Daniel