
19 Jun
2012
19 Jun
'12
5:12 p.m.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Not providing a variant that doesn't throw on bad input is problematic too (IMO). A non-throwing variant should be available. A throwing variant can then be build on top of it.
No, it can not - because unhex has no control over the output iterator (which can throw).
Sure, but an unhex that doesn't throw on bad input would still be possible.
BTW, shouldn't hex be in the string directory?
No. It's not a string algorithm.
Where did my other questions go? -- Olaf