5 May
2005
5 May
'05
3:34 a.m.
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> writes:
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
well, you can't call it io::char :-)
Yeah, I know. Since char_<> would be an abomination,
Why?
the alternative is char_type.
character_type?
I've got the same problem with int_type.
Not sure how that fits in... :( -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com