Hi,
I think also you might consider acting a review manager for another library before asking anyone to act as review manager for yours.
I am a not very active user! But I would like to help community. We have a
lot of good libs on schedule for long time that I would like to see in
boost. What is needed to become a Review Manager?
Other suggestion, I think that proposed libs should be in a place like more
prominently on the ‘boost’ site (as a direct link)! Something like:
libraries proposals awaiting review.
So users can have direct access to these libraries, test them and give
feedback to the authors.
I think that : Community -> Review -> Schedule (
http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html) don’t promote
discussion about the proposed libs. Well this is only a suggestion!
Thanks
Renato
2014-05-07 6:22 GMT-03:00 Niall Douglas
On 5 May 2014 at 15:58, Sohail Somani wrote:
The proposed `Boost.Application´, needs a Review Manager. Anyone is interested?
I think also you might consider acting a review manager for another library before asking anyone to act as review manager for yours. We'll never process the queue if everyone wants but no one wants to give.
Getting your library reviewed is more about crossing off any possible reasons why it shouldn't be reviewed rather than making a case for that it should be reviewed.
Niall
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost