-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Hartmut Kaiser Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 3:51 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] "protected" APIs
On 01/02/2012 10:25 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
Hello all,
Boost.Closure (formerly, Boost.Local) needs to use some macros, types, etc that are currently marked private in Boost.ScopeExit:
Boost.Closure? I really don't like that name is at implies functional programming capabilities. Didn't you decide to name it Boost.LocalFunction instead?
I second that concern. I wouldn't like for the local function library to claim the name 'closure'. This would be
a) totally misleading and b) inhibits to give that name to a potential real closure library in the future.
+1 - objection - Violent!!! ;-) to Boost.Closure - despite some rationale. Boost.LocalFunction is better. Paul --- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow@hetp.u-net.com