Re: [boost] boost.url review

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 11:12 AM Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:

Maybe an alternative would be to keep them in the public API but give them a separate namespace, like `urls::encoding`. This would indicate more clearly that you have a relatively separate sub-library there, that needs to stay for logistic reasons.

Yes that is precisely the design choice that we made, that namespace is `boost::urls::grammar` Thanks