29 May
2008
29 May
'08
1:58 p.m.
Beman Dawes wrote:
BOOST_NO_UNICODE_LITERALS // no Unicode literals
Grrr... At least one compiler beta is supporting u and U literals, but not U8 literals. Although irritating, I guess that's a sign we need finer grained macros for these. Because the case is significant, there is a bit of a naming issue, too. Maybe: BOOST_NO_UTF8_LITERALS // no u8 literals BOOST_NO_CHAR16_T_LITERALS // no u literals BOOST_NO_CHAR32_T_LITERALS // no U literals Comments? --Beman